Sunday, August 27, 2006

Your spicy chicken strips may be too spicy if…

1. If after placing a strip on your plate, you lick your fingers and the grease is too spicy…your spicy chicken strips…

2. If your chicken strips stain your fingers neon orange…your spicy chicken strips…

3. If you require half a glass of milk per strip eaten…your spicy chicken strips…

And finally…Your spicy chicken strips may be too spicy if…

4. You cannot taste your fries or desert because your taste buds have given up and called it a night.

Thursday, August 24, 2006

FDA Bows to Politics

The FDA came out with a statement and subsequent action this week and it is not in the best interest of the American public. This week the FDA approved the transition of PlanB® to over the counter status for women older than 16 years of age. I am unclear of how this program will be regulated or monitored but in my humble but accurate opinion this is a horrible move by the FDA for both moral and health/scientific reasons.

Explanation

Women older than 16 years of age will now be able to purchase this ‘emergency’ hormone contraceptive (EHC) ‘medicine’ with out a prescription. Women younger than 16 years of age will continue to require a prescription from a medical provider for access to it. The ‘necessity’ for this over the counter (OTC) transition has been purported to be previously hindered access to the ‘medication’ in a timely fashion. If this drug is not acquired and administered within 72 hours, its efficacy is dramatically reduced. If the realization of necessity is Friday night, for instance, and a provider is not consulted until Monday afternoon, it is possible that the 72 hour limit will be breached. This is the reason proponents, such as Planned Parrenthood, have pushed so hard for PlanB® OTC status.

In my humble but accurate assessment, there are at least 3 HUGH problems with this action. (1) Relaxing access to women > 16 and ‘restricting’ access to women < 16 is not likely to happen. Many women will, no doubt, purchase the product under the guise of personal use and then turn around and sell it to ‘ineligible’ patients. Just look at the tobacco market in America. Restrictions have been in place for the sale of tobacco to minors for decades yet the CDC currently reports (year 2004) that as many as 40.2 % of 6-12th graders have or currently use tobacco. The law says that minors may not have access to tobacco. This is obviously not found in practice.

(2) EHC will be used as a primary means of birth control. It is only indicated for ‘emergencies’, not continual use. In my humble but accurate opinion, women who either cannot afford the cost of visiting a medical provider or do not want to take the time out of their schedule will travel from pharmacy to pharmacy acquiring the OTC product. They will go to Walgreen’s the first time, CVS/Pharmacy the second, Wal-Mart the 3rd, Wal-Mart down the road the 4th, and then progress down the never ending list of grocery store pharmacies for each subsequent ‘need’. I guarantee that at each pharmacy visit they will be asked, “When was the last time that you used this product?” The answer will always be, “Oh, I have used it once before years ago.” This becomes a problem because it is unhealthy to consistently expose one’s self to this dose of hormones.

(3) EHC do not cause abortion but they do provide the possibility for terminating (aka ‘killing’ for those not offended by politically incorrect terms) the life of a human. The ease of access to this drug will decrease the time spent in contemplation prior to its use and increase total financial health care burden to society because of the likely side effects caused by continual use and abuse.

The FDA usually acts in the best interest of the American public. This time they gave way to political and health care activists at the cost of harming the public. Let’s be vigilant to watch the ‘post marketing’ research and see how long it takes for the first ‘continual’ user detrimental effects of this decision. It will arrive sooner than later, mark my words.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Most Interesting Page

Today I just finished with the morning patients at the clinic when my pager went off again. I called and was a little annoyed because the number was for a recorded message. It sounded kind of official so I gave it another 3 seconds to win me over. It asked for an extension (provided on my pager) so I typed it in.

Something similar to the following was the message, “Attention bomb technician…please contact Sergeant X at dispatch as soon as possible, code xxxx (some numeric code)…repeating…Attention bomb technician…please contact Sergeant X at dispatch as soon as possible, code xxxx. This concludes this message from the Houston Metro Police Department, Goodbye.”

What!! They are calling ME to dismantle a bomb?!? This can not be right. So I called ‘dispatch’ and asked for Sergeant X. The nice lady that answered the phone sounded kind of put off by my call, however when I gave her the code given by the automated message, she quickly said, “One minute.” Half a second later Sergeant X was on the phone.

Apparently HMPD uses an outside company to send pages to its technicians. Somehow my number got in their database.

About 20-30 minutes later I received another page. I did not return that page.

Sunday, August 20, 2006

I am disappointed

Last Saturday, on the way to work, I was disappointed by the absence of a certain program on the radio. I enjoy my Saturday morning commute to work because I am able to listen to “The Pond” on 88.3 FM. I learn valuable lessons and hear application of Biblical principals in everyday events; events such as being nice to foreign exchange students, sharing my favorite toy with others, and dealing with bullies on the playground.

It happened again this week. Bill the duck, Mathuselah the alligator, Tony the frog, Floyd the turtle, and Dr. Holstein (who is actually a chicken) were noticeably absent from my radio dial this past Saturday morning. I must say that I am disappointed with the programming change at 88.3 FM ~ KAFR.

Monday, August 14, 2006

Paging Mr. Hopper

Wow, it finally happened. Today I received my first page. Until this rotation, I have been at institutions that did not use/need pagers (they ‘know' how to find you!). Not so any longer!

This is how it went down:
Immersed in conversation with a colleague and deep in though, out of no where my pager goes off. Oh wow, I thought. I need to respond to this! It is probably a life or death situation that needs my special attention right now! I will not keep the profession / patient waiting…’somebody, where is a phone? I need to answer a page!’

Dialing…’Hello, this is OS Hopper returning a page.’
The other side of the phone, ‘Um you left a message on my voice mail saying that you need a password so you can use the computer?’

Ok, so it was not important. But hey, someone actually paged me!

Friday, August 11, 2006

Efficiency...

Now this is a good idea...

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

No, a last day of work cannot start any better.

I think that I immensely enjoy ‘last days’ at work. Today was my last day at a particular location and when I arrived I was greeted with, ‘Good morning Mr. Hopper. There are some donuts over there for you.’

To my delight there was a box of 1 dozen cake donuts (only 4 Blueberry because ‘they’ did not have 12 the morning my preceptor picked them up). I shared them with the others throughout the day and at the end of the day I was able to bring the remaining pastry jewels home!! What a great day!

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

The Year of Taste Bud Jubliee

Have you ever refused to eat something for years and years on end? Coleslaw is one example of this in my book. Today I gave it a second trial run. It was not bad. The flavor was great but the substance left something to be desired. While it is not my favorite side dish, I believe that a little coleslaw will be good every now and then.

In conclusion, I recommend considering the possibility of a ‘taste bud year of jubilee’. Every seven years or so, try something that you have previously and accurately labeled: disgusting. You may have changed your mind and if this is the case your taste buds will have a glorious time of jubilee as they encounter a new food and taste!

Friday, August 04, 2006

Presidential Trivia

We have had only 4 presidents with a full beard. Three of them served consecutive terms:
1. Grant: 1869-1877
2. Hayes: 1877-1881
3. Garfield: 1881-1881
4. B. Harrison: 1889-1893

We have had 5 others with various facial accoutrements:
1. Lincoln: 1861-1865 (beard minus mustache)
2. Arthur: 1881-1885 (beard minus chin)
3. Cleveland: 1885-1889 & 1893-1897 (mustache)
4. T. Roosevelt: 1901-1909 (mustache)
5. Taft: 1909-1913 (mustache)